Subject	mine is biased because its between TT 2+2 w/o hicas and
Posted by	gt300zxtt on April 12, 2009 at 5:19 PM
	This message has been viewed 81 times.
In Reply To	But was HICAS in use or deleted? posted by Dane (Houston) on April 12, 2009 at 05:03 PM
Message	N/A 2+0 w/ hicas. fsm notes differences of slightly less rack sliding force for cars with hicas. combine that with less weight on the shorter hicas n/a vs a heavy long TT w/o hicas.
Follow Ups	a steering rack zlama dilama. - SuparexTT 15:40:35 04/12/09 steering is tighter on the tt chassis - gt300zxtt 16:32:33 04/12/09 But was HICAS in use or deleted? - Dane (Houston) 17:03:38 04/12/09 mine is biased because its between TT 2+2 w/o hicas and - gt300zxtt 17:19:01 04/12/09 I have read that the steering is tighter on the NA. - nemo1080 (Iowa) 16:35:05 04/12/09 You are wrong :) TT is less lock to lock. (n/m) - Spddracer 18:27:39 04/12/09 you have it backwards (n/m) - aliaZ 00:17:27 04/13/09 I loved how my NA rack felt. My TT rack feels different - puddlejumpinzx 16:35:07 04/12/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.